Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPlanque, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorFavreau, Aurelien
dc.contributor.authorHusson, Berengere
dc.contributor.authorMousing, Erik Askov
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Cecilie
dc.contributor.authorBroms, Cecilie
dc.contributor.authorLindstrøm, Ulf Ove
dc.contributor.authorSivel, Elliot Manuarii
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-07T09:19:24Z
dc.date.available2023-03-07T09:19:24Z
dc.date.created2022-12-16T13:21:13Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationICES Journal of Marine Science. 2022, 79 (6), 1815-1830.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1054-3139
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3056322
dc.description.abstractWhile ecosystem-based fisheries management calls for explicit accounting for interactions between exploited populations and their environment, moving from single species to ecosystem-level assessment is a significant challenge. For many ecologically significant groups, data may be lacking, collected at inappropriate scales or be highly uncertain. In this study, we aim to reconstruct trophic interactions in the Norwegian Sea pelagic food-web during the last three decades. For this purpose, we develop a food-web assessment model constrained by existing observations and knowledge. The model is based on inverse modelling and is designed to handle input observations and knowledge that are uncertain. We analyse if the reconstructed food-web dynamics are supportive of top-down or bottom-up controls on zooplankton and small pelagic fish and of competition for resources between the three small pelagic species. Despite high uncertainties in the reconstructed dynamics, the model results highlight that interannual variations in the biomass of copepods, krill, amphipods, herring, and blue whiting can primarily be explained by changes in their consumption rather than by predation and fishing. For mackerel, variations in biomass cannot be unambiguously attributed to either consumption or predation and fishing. The model results provide no support for top-down control on planktonic prey biomass and little support for the hypothesised competition for resources between the three small pelagic species, despite partially overlapping diets. This suggests that the lack of explicit accounting for trophic interactions between the three pelagic species likely have had little impact on the robustness of past stock assessments and management in the Norwegian Sea.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.titleQuantification of trophic interactions in the Norwegian Sea pelagic food-web over multiple decadesen_US
dc.title.alternativeQuantification of trophic interactions in the Norwegian Sea pelagic food-web over multiple decadesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1815-1830en_US
dc.source.volume79en_US
dc.source.journalICES Journal of Marine Scienceen_US
dc.source.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/icesjms/fsac111
dc.identifier.cristin2094381
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 276730en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 299554en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel