Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHaugland, Eli Kyrkjebø
dc.contributor.authorMisund, Ole Arve
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-01T13:28:11Z
dc.date.available2013-03-01T13:28:11Z
dc.date.issued2011-12-28
dc.identifier.issn1874-2521
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/109259
dc.description.abstractUse of horizontal guided sonar in addition to vertical echo sounder may improve biomass estimation of pelagic fish schooling near the surface. But proportions of horizontal guided sonar to vertical echo integration estimates have been shown to be very variable, and it is necessary to provide better knowledge on factors that influence acoustic recordings of fish near surface before a reliable method of combining sonar and echo integration estimates can be established. To explore factors that influence horizontal sonar recordings of fish biomass near surface, we collected and analysed data from two acoustic surveys on Norwegian spring-spawning herring (Clupea harengus L.) in the Norwegian Sea in 1997 and 1998, and two acoustic surveys off the southwest coast of Africa, investigating pilchard (Sardinops sagax), anchovy (Engraulis capensis) and round herring (Etrumeus whiteheadi) off the coast of Namibia in 1994, and sardinella (Sardinella sp.) off the coast of Angola in 1995. The ratios of fish densities obtained by sonar to those obtained by echo sounder varied both with respect to location and between different years within a specific location. For three of the four surveys, the biomass estimated by sonar was significantly higher than the estimates by echo sounder, whereas in the remaining survey there was no significant difference in estimated biomass. Periods of bad weather, shallow, or lowdensity patchy fish distributions and mixture of the target species with other species contributed to the higher and more variable sonar estimates. Still a goal should be to improve knowledge about the factors that contributes to variations between simultaneously recorded echo sounder and sonar data. An aim should be to combine the recordings from both methods in the biomass estimations, or at least assess which of the estimates that are less biased under the prevailing environmental conditions and actual school distribution.no_NO
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.publisherBentham Openno_NO
dc.relation.urihttp://benthamscience.com/open/openaccess.php?tooceaj/articles/V005/42TOOCEAJ.htm
dc.subjectsonarno_NO
dc.subjectecho sounderno_NO
dc.subjectacousticsno_NO
dc.subjectabundance estimatesno_NO
dc.subjectbiomassno_NO
dc.subjectpelagic schooling fishno_NO
dc.titleInfluence of Different Factors on Abundance Estimates Obtained from Simultaneous Sonar and Echo Sounder Recordingsno_NO
dc.typeJournal articleno_NO
dc.typePeer reviewedno_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920::Fish health: 923no_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920::Aquaculture: 922no_NO
dc.source.pagenumber9 s.no_NO
dc.source.volume5no_NO
dc.source.journalThe Open Oceanography Journalno_NO
dc.source.issue1no_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.2174/1874252101105010042


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel