Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFiske, Peder
dc.contributor.authorForseth, Torbjørn
dc.contributor.authorThorstad, Eva Bonsak
dc.contributor.authorBakkestuen, Vegar
dc.contributor.authorEinum, Sigurd
dc.contributor.authorFalkegård, Morten
dc.contributor.authorGarmo, Øyvind A.
dc.contributor.authorGarseth, Åse Helen
dc.contributor.authorSkoglund, Helge
dc.contributor.authorSolberg, Monica Favnebøe
dc.contributor.authorUtne, Kjell Rong
dc.contributor.authorVollset, Knut
dc.contributor.authorVøllestad, Leif Asbjørn
dc.contributor.authorWennevik, Vidar
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-15T11:40:08Z
dc.date.available2024-01-15T11:40:08Z
dc.date.created2024-01-11T15:00:37Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn1052-7613
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3111513
dc.description.abstract1. The state of sea trout in 1251 Norwegian watercourses was assessed based on a scoring system for human pressures, abundance data, and local knowledge. 2. Over 16,000 km of rivers and lakes were available to sea trout in these watercourses, spanning from the temperate to Arctic regions. 3. Sea trout were classified to be in a good or very good state in fewer than 25% of the watercourses and in a poor or very poor state in almost 40%. Twenty-nine watercourses had lost their sea trout populations. 4. Salmon lice from aquaculture salmon farms had by far the largest adverse effect on sea trout among the human impact factors, both in the number of watercourses (83%) and river area affected (60%), and the total effect on sea trout abundance. 5. Agriculture and hydropower production also had strong adverse impacts (35% and 19% of watercourses), but substantially lower than that caused by salmon lice. Culverts related to road crossings and other habitat alterations also had impacts on sea trout in many watercourses (27%). 6. Exploitation of sea trout has been reduced in Norway in recent years, both in the marine and freshwater fisheries. Yet, the exploitation pressure was moderate or high in almost 14% of the watercourses where the state of sea trout was poor or very poor, suggesting a high potential for overexploitation in these. 7. The state of sea trout was best in the northern sparsely populated areas. However, distribution of watercourses with sea trout in a poor or very poor state was more linked to aquaculture, agriculture, and hydropower production than human population density. 8. The developed approach for large-scale mapping of state and pressures, which is vital for prioritizing management measures, may inspire other nations in their conservation effort for this important species. acidification, anthropogenic pressures, brown trout (Salmo trutta), culverts, exploitation, hazardous substances, salmon lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis), sewage
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titleNovel large-scale mapping highlights poor state of sea trout populations
dc.title.alternativeNovel large-scale mapping highlights poor state of sea trout populations
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Zoology and botany: 480
dc.source.journalAquatic conservation
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/aqc.4067
dc.identifier.cristin2224776
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 160022
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel