Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRijal, Dilli Prasad
dc.contributor.authorHanebrekke, Tanja Lexau
dc.contributor.authorArneberg, Per
dc.contributor.authorJohansen, Torild
dc.contributor.authorSint, Daniela
dc.contributor.authorTraugott, Michael
dc.contributor.authorSkern-Mauritzen, Mette
dc.contributor.authorWestgaard, Jon-Ivar
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-02T13:25:52Z
dc.date.available2023-10-02T13:25:52Z
dc.date.created2023-08-24T09:59:39Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationEcology and Evolution. 2023, 13 (6), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn2045-7758
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3093506
dc.description.abstractKnowledge of trophic interaction is necessary to understand the dynamics of ecosystems and develop ecosystem-based management. The key data to measure these interactions should come from large-scale diet analyses with good taxonomic resolution. To that end, molecular methods that analyze prey DNA from guts and feces provide high-resolution dietary taxonomic data. However, molecular diet analysis may also produce unreliable results if the samples are contaminated by external sources of DNA. Employing the freshwater European whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus) as a tracer for sample contamination, we studied the possible route of whitefish in beaked redfish (Sebastes mentella) guts sampled in the Barents Sea. We used whitefish-specific COI primers for diagnostic analysis, and fish-specific 12S and metazoa-specific COI primers for metabarcoding analyses of intestine and stomach contents of fish samples that were either not cleaned, water cleaned, or bleach cleaned after being in contact with whitefish. Both the diagnostic and COI metabarcoding revealed clear positive effects of cleaning samples as whitefish were detected in significantly higher numbers of uncleaned samples compared to water or bleach-cleaned samples. Stomachs were more susceptible to contamination than intestines and bleach cleaning reduced the frequency of whitefish contamination. Also, the metabarcoding approach detected significantly more reads of whitefish in the stomach than in intestine samples. The diagnostic analysis and COI metabarcoding detected contaminants in a higher and comparable number of gut samples than the 12S-based approach. Our study underlines thus the importance of surface decontamination of aquatic samples to obtain reliable diet information from molecular data.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.titleContaminants reach everywhere: Fish dietary samples should be surface decontaminated prior to molecular diet analysisen_US
dc.title.alternativeContaminants reach everywhere: Fish dietary samples should be surface decontaminated prior to molecular diet analysisen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber15en_US
dc.source.volume13en_US
dc.source.journalEcology and Evolutionen_US
dc.source.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ece3.10187
dc.identifier.cristin2169243
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel