Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRisebrobakken, Bjørg
dc.contributor.authorJensen, Mari Fjalstad
dc.contributor.authorLangehaug, Helene R.
dc.contributor.authorEldevik, Tor
dc.contributor.authorSandø, Anne Britt
dc.contributor.authorLi, Camille
dc.contributor.authorBorn, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorMcClymont, Erin Louise
dc.contributor.authorSalzmann, Ulrich
dc.contributor.authorDe Schepper, Stijn
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-07T10:54:12Z
dc.date.available2023-09-07T10:54:12Z
dc.date.created2023-08-30T14:34:18Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationClimate of the Past. 2023, 19 (5), 1101-1123.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1814-9324
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3087904
dc.description.abstractAnalyses of observational data (from year 1870 AD) show that sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies along the pathway of Atlantic Water transport in the North Atlantic, the Norwegian Sea and the Iceland Sea are spatially coherent at multidecadal timescales. Spatially coherent SST anomalies are also observed over hundreds of thousands of years during parts of the Pliocene (5.23–5.03, 4.63–4.43, and 4.33–4.03 Ma). However, when investigating CMIP6 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6) SSP126 (Shared Socioeconomic Pathway) future scenario runs (next century) and other Pliocene time intervals, the following three additional SST relations emerge: (1) the Norwegian Sea SST anomaly is dissimilar to the North Atlantic and the Iceland Sea SST anomalies (Pliocene; 4.93–4.73 and 3.93–3.63 Ma), (2) the Iceland Sea SST anomaly is dissimilar to the North Atlantic and the Norwegian Sea SST anomalies (Pliocene; 3.43–3.23 Ma), and (3) the North Atlantic SST anomaly is dissimilar to the SST anomalies of the Norwegian and Iceland seas (future trend). Hence, spatially non-coherent SST anomalies may occur in equilibrium climates (Pliocene), as well as in response to transient forcing (CMIP6 SSP126 low-emission future scenario). Since buoyancy is a key forcing for the inflow of Atlantic Water to the Norwegian Sea, we investigate the impacts of buoyancy forcing on spatial relations between SST anomalies seen in the North Atlantic and the Norwegian and Iceland seas. This is done by performing a range of idealized experiments using the Massachusetts Institute of Technology general circulation model (MITgcm). Through these idealized experiments we can reproduce three out of four of the documented SST anomaly relations: being spatially coherent under weak to intermediate freshwater forcing over the Nordic Seas, the Iceland Sea being dissimilar to the North Atlantic and the Norwegian Sea under weak atmospheric warming over the Nordic Seas, and the North Atlantic being dissimilar to the Norwegian and Iceland seas under strong atmospheric warming over the Nordic Seas. We suggest that the unexplained SST anomaly relation, when the Norwegian Sea is dissimilar to the North Atlantic and the Iceland Sea, may reflect a response to a weakened Norwegian Atlantic Current compensated for by a strong Irminger Current or an expanded East Greenland Current.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.titleBuoyancy forcing: A key driver of northern North Atlantic sea surface temperature variability across multiple timescalesen_US
dc.title.alternativeBuoyancy forcing: A key driver of northern North Atlantic sea surface temperature variability across multiple timescalesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1101-1123en_US
dc.source.volume19en_US
dc.source.journalClimate of the Pasten_US
dc.source.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/cp-19-1101-2023
dc.identifier.cristin2171051
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel