Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKleppe, Lene
dc.contributor.authorFjelldal, Per Gunnar
dc.contributor.authorAndersson, Eva
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Tom Johnny
dc.contributor.authorSanden, Monica
dc.contributor.authorBruvik, Aina
dc.contributor.authorSkaftnesmo, Kai Ove
dc.contributor.authorFurmanek, Tomasz
dc.contributor.authorKjærner-Semb, Erik Nordtorp
dc.contributor.authorCrespo, Diego
dc.contributor.authorFlavell, Simon
dc.contributor.authorPedersen, Audun Østby
dc.contributor.authorVogelsang, Petra
dc.contributor.authorTorsvik, Anja
dc.contributor.authorKvestad, Karen Anita
dc.contributor.authorOlausson, Sara
dc.contributor.authorNorberg, Birgitta
dc.contributor.authorSchulz, Rüdiger W.
dc.contributor.authorBogerd, J.
dc.contributor.authorSanti, N.
dc.contributor.authorEdvardsen, Rolf Brudvik
dc.contributor.authorWargelius, Anna
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-07T09:59:10Z
dc.date.available2023-02-07T09:59:10Z
dc.date.created2022-09-19T10:22:30Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationAquaculture. 2022, 560 .en_US
dc.identifier.issn0044-8486
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3048809
dc.description.abstractUsing germ cell-free (GCF), sterile, dnd-knockout salmon for farming could solve the problems associated with precocious maturation and genetic introgression of farmed breeds into wild populations. However, prior to using GCF fish in the salmon farming industry, it is crucial to understand if, or how, the GCF phenotype differs from wild type (WT) counterparts in terms of growth and welfare. To characterize the GCF phenotype throughout a production cycle, we reared GCF and WT salmon in indoor common garden tanks for 3 years, until harvest size. Regarding body size, smoltification markers (mRNA levels of gill Na+/K+-ATPase [NKA] subunits), plasma stress indicators (pH, glucose, sodium, chloride, calcium), relative heart size, prevalence of vertebra deformities and fillet proximate composition, GCF fish could not be distinguished from WTs. Transient differences were detected in plasma concentrations of lactate and osmolality, and only a few genes were differentially expressed in WT and GCF transcriptomes of muscle and pituitary. At harvest, fillets from GCF and WT salmon contained the same amount of omega-3 fatty acids, however the relative content of omega-3 fatty acids was higher in GCF compared to WT males. Towards harvest size, body growth rate, condition factor and relative liver size were significantly higher in WT than in GCF fish, probably relating to initiation of puberty in WTs. Since GCF salmon never become sexually mature, it is possible to postpone the time of harvest to exploit the growth potential uninhibited by sexual maturation. In conclusion, GCF salmon performed to a large extent similarly to their WT counterparts but had the clear advantage of never maturing.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.titleFull production cycle performance of gene-edited, sterile Atlantic salmon - growth, smoltification, welfare indicators and fillet compositionen_US
dc.title.alternativeFull production cycle performance of gene-edited, sterile Atlantic salmon - growth, smoltification, welfare indicators and fillet compositionen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber0en_US
dc.source.volume560en_US
dc.source.journalAquacultureen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.738456
dc.identifier.cristin2052973
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel