Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorEikeset, Anne Marie
dc.contributor.authorRichter, Andries Peter
dc.contributor.authorDankel, Dorothy
dc.contributor.authorDunlop, Erin
dc.contributor.authorHeino, Mikko
dc.contributor.authorDieckmann, Ulf
dc.contributor.authorStenseth, Nils Christian
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-01T07:53:22Z
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-06T06:54:45Z
dc.date.available2015-04-01T07:53:22Z
dc.date.available2015-05-06T06:54:45Z
dc.date.issued2012-12-12
dc.identifier.citationEikeset, A. M., Richter, A. P., Dankel, D. J., Dunlop, E. S., Heino, M., Dieckmann, U., & Stenseth, N. C. (2013). A bio-economic analysis of harvest control rules for the Northeast Arctic cod fishery. Marine Policy, 39(0), 172-181. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.10.020nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0308-597X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/283127
dc.description-nb_NO
dc.description.abstractHarvest control rules (HCRs) have been implemented for many fisheries worldwide. However, in most instances, those HCRs are not based on the explicit feedbacks between stock properties and economic considerations. This paper develops a bio-economic model that evaluates the HCR adopted in 2004 by the Joint Norwegian–Russian Fishery Commission to manage the world's largest cod stock, Northeast Arctic cod (NEA). The model considered here is biologically and economically detailed, and is the first to compare the performance of the stock's current HCR with that of alternative HCRs derived with optimality criteria. In particular, HCRs are optimized for economic objectives including fleet profits, economic welfare, and total yield and the emerging properties are analyzed. The performance of these optimal HCRs was compared with the currently used HCR. This paper show that the current HCR does in fact comes very close to maximizing profits. Furthermore, the results reveal that the HCR that maximizes profits is the most precautionary one among the considered HCRs. Finally, the HCR that maximizes yield leads to un-precautionary low levels of biomass. In these ways, the implementation of the HCR for NEA cod can be viewed as a success story that may provide valuable lessons for other fisheries.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.titleA bio-economic analysis of harvest control rules for the Northeast Arctic cod fisherynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.date.updated2015-04-01T07:53:22Z
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920::Resource biology: 921nb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920::Catch: 925nb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber172-181nb_NO
dc.source.volume39nb_NO
dc.source.journalMarine Policynb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.marpol.2012.10.020
dc.identifier.cristin1012152


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel