• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Havforskningsinstituttet
  • Publikasjoner fra CRIStin
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Havforskningsinstituttet
  • Publikasjoner fra CRIStin
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Does grab size influence sampled macrofauna composition? A test conducted on deep-sea communities in the northeast Atlantic

Holte, Børge; Buhl-Mortensen, Lene
Journal article, Peer reviewed
Published version
Thumbnail
View/Open
1-s2.0-S0141113619305276-main.pdf (2.171Mb)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2644801
Date
2019
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Articles [1825]
  • Publikasjoner fra CRIStin [1458]
Original version
Marine Environmental Research. 2019, 154 .   10.1016/j.marenvres.2019.104867
Abstract
In deep-sea surveys, heavy gears are often preferred to effectively collect macro benthos while smaller samplers are sufficient in coastal and shallow areas. However, there are few comparative studies of the samples retained and results gained from different-sized grabs. To study the differences in sampling properties between a small (sampling area of 0.1 m2) and a large (0.25 m2) van Veen grab, 1 m2 of seafloor was sampled with each of the grab sizes at four test sites in the Barents- and Norwegian Sea; one inside a fjord and three offshore, across a depth range of 287–963 m. Overall, the small and large grab collected a comparable number of species and individuals: 248 and 233 species, and 6074 and 6143 individuals, respectively. The large grab retrieved the most species at the deepest location while the small grab collected more species at the other test sites. Based on internationally recommended 0.5 m2 sampling units, a variation in the total species richness per test site of 7–13% was found while the diversity indices (ES100 and H′) varied by less than 10%. Independent of grab size, a cluster and nMDS analysis showed four clearly separated sample-groups that correspond to the four test stations although the multivariate dispersion was consistently higher for the small grab. A SIMPROF test showed no grab size-dependent differences. ANOSIM and PERMANOVA tests showed differences between grab sizes for the deepest station, where a similar difference occurred also between samples of the same grab size. This station displayed the least faunal heterogeneity, indicating that faunal patchiness may influence any grab-size differences. The results indicate that the two van Veen grabs tested deliver comparable quantitative faunal compositions. For the small grab, however, numerous samples were rejected due to poor performance, resulting in increased sampling time, ship costs and a suggested biased sampling towards less heterogeneous sediments at the fjord site.
Journal
Marine Environmental Research

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit