Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHendry, Katharine R.
dc.contributor.authorPyle, Kimberley M.
dc.contributor.authorButler, G. Barney
dc.contributor.authorCooper, Adam
dc.contributor.authorFransson, Agneta Ingrid
dc.contributor.authorChierici, Melissa
dc.contributor.authorLeng, Melanie J.
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Amelie
dc.contributor.authorDodd, Paul A.
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-28T12:56:56Z
dc.date.available2019-03-28T12:56:56Z
dc.date.created2019-03-11T11:18:16Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Geophysical Research - Space Physics. 2018, 123 (5), 1-16.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn2169-9380
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2592239
dc.description.abstractFreshwater export from the Arctic is critical in determining the density of water at sites of North Atlantic deep water formation, which in turn influences the global flux of oceanic heat and nutrients. We need geochemical tracers and high‐resolution observations to refine our freshwater budgets and constrain models for future change. The use of seawater barium concentrations in the Arctic Ocean as a freshwater tracer relies on the conservative behavior of barium in seawater; while this has been shown to be an unreliable assumption in Arctic summers, there are a lack of studies observing seasonal progressions. Here, we present barium concentrations from seawater and sea‐ice collected during the Norwegian Young Sea ICE expedition from boreal winter into summer. We use other tracers (salinity, oxygen isotopes, and alkalinity) to reconstruct freshwater inputs and calculate a barium “deficit” that can be attributed to nonconservative processes. We locate a deficit in winter when biological production is low, which we attribute to uptake by barite formation associated with old organic matter or by internal sea‐ice processes. We also find a significant barium deficit during the early spring bloom, consistent with uptake into organic‐matter associated microenvironments. However, in summer, there no strong barium deficit near the surface, despite high biological production and organic carbon standing stocks, perhaps reflecting phytoplankton assemblage changes, and/or rapid internal cycling. Our findings challenge the assumptions surrounding the use of barium as an Arctic freshwater tracer, and highlight the need to improve our understanding of barium in sea‐ice environments.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.titleSpatiotemporal variability of barium in arctic sea-ice and seawaternb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber1-16nb_NO
dc.source.volume123nb_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of Geophysical Research - Space Physicsnb_NO
dc.source.issue5nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1029/2017JC013668
dc.identifier.cristin1683693
cristin.unitcode7431,20,0,0
cristin.unitnameOseanografi og klima
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel