Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorChoquet, Marvin
dc.contributor.authorKosobokova, Ksenia
dc.contributor.authorKwaśniewski, Sławomir
dc.contributor.authorHatlebakk, Maja Karoline Viddal
dc.contributor.authorDhanasiri, Anusha Krishanthi Shyama
dc.contributor.authorMelle, Webjørn Raunsgård
dc.contributor.authorDaase, Malin
dc.contributor.authorSvensen, Camilla
dc.contributor.authorSøreide, Janne
dc.contributor.authorHoarau, Galice Guillaume
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-25T10:44:24Z
dc.date.available2018-07-25T10:44:24Z
dc.date.created2018-02-21T16:34:21Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationLimnology and Oceanography : Methods. 2018, 16 (4), 237-252.
dc.identifier.issn1541-5856
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2506422
dc.description.abstractCopepods of the genus Calanus play a key role in marine food webs as consumers of primary producers and as prey for many commercially important marine species. Within the genus, Calanus glacialis and Calanus finmarchi- cus are considered indicator species for Arctic and Atlantic waters, respectively, and changes in their distributions are frequently used as a tool to track climate change effects in the marine ecosystems of the northern hemisphere. Despite the extensive literature available, discrimination between these two species remains challenging. Using genetically identified individuals, we simultaneously checked the morphological characters in use for C. glacialis and C. finmarchicus identification to compare the results of molecular and morphological identification. We stud- ied the prosome length (1); the antennules and the genital somite pigmentation (2); the morphology of the fifth pair of swimming legs and of the mandible (3). Our results show that none of these morphological criteria can reli- ably distinguish between C. glacialis and C. finmarchicus . This has severe implications for our current understand- ing of plankton ecology as a large part of our knowledge of Calanus may be biased due to species misidentification and may subsequently require reinvestigation with the systematic use of molecular tools.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titleCan morphology reliably distinguish between the copepods Calanus finmarchicus and C. glacialis, or is DNA the only way?
dc.title.alternativeCan morphology reliably distinguish between the copepods Calanus finmarchicus and C. glacialis, or is DNA the only way?
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.source.pagenumber237-252
dc.source.volume16
dc.source.journalLimnology and Oceanography : Methods
dc.source.issue4
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/lom3.10240
dc.identifier.cristin1567686
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 226417
dc.relation.projectAndre: Russian Foundation for Basic Research (15-29-02447)
dc.relation.projectEC/FP7/264933
dc.relation.projectAndre: Russian Foundation for Basic Research (16-04-00375)
dc.relation.projectAndre: Pol-Nor/201992/93/2014
dc.relation.projectAndre: Russian Scientific Foundation (14-50-00095)
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 216578
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 227139
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 246747
cristin.unitcode7431,22,0,0
cristin.unitnamePlankton
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel