Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorDankel, Dorothy Jane
dc.contributor.authorDieckmann, Ulf
dc.contributor.authorHeino, Mikko
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-07T08:57:54Z
dc.date.available2012-02-07T08:57:54Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationThis report is not to be quoted without prior consultation with the General Secretary.no_NO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/103276
dc.description.abstractThe inherent conflicts between objectives in fisheries management (e.g. MSY vs. conservation interests) are a hurdle for managers and scientists. However, some objectives may be compatible (e.g. economic yield and ecosystem preservation, Hilborn 2007) and could promote stakeholder consensus. The purpose of this study is to explore the “zone of new consensus” as outline by Hilborn (2007) and to develop a formal and quantitative approach to defining fisheries management objectives through stakeholder-specific utility functions. First, multiple objectives are reflected in a clearly defined utility function for each stakeholder group. Second, simulations are run to find the resulting stakeholder groups’ utility. The preliminary results illustrate a formal route towards deriving appropriate management regimes with focus on compatible management goals to promote a new paradigm of stakeholder consensus, incentives, and success in fishery management.no_NO
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.publisherICESno_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesICES CM documents;2007/O:17
dc.subjectfisheries managementno_NO
dc.subjectfiskeriforvaltningno_NO
dc.titleSuccess in fishery management by reconciling stakeholder objectives in Hilborn’s “zone of new consensus”no_NO
dc.typeWorking paperno_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920::Other fisheries disciplines: 929no_NO
dc.source.pagenumber8 s.no_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel