Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSkogen, Morten D.
dc.contributor.authorBerx, B.
dc.contributor.authorDickey-Collas, Mark
dc.contributor.authorDe Roeck, Y.-H.
dc.contributor.authorKlein, H.
dc.contributor.authorBarciela Fernandez, R.
dc.contributor.authorFoster, R.
dc.contributor.authorDombrowsky, E.
dc.contributor.authorHuret, Martin
dc.contributor.authorPayne, Mark R.
dc.contributor.authorSagarminaga, Y.
dc.contributor.authorShrum, C
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-27T12:23:37Z
dc.date.available2011-05-27T12:23:37Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn1042-8275
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/117199
dc.descriptionCitation: Berx, B., M. Dickey-Collas, M.D. Skogen, Y.-H. De Roeck, H. Klein, R. Barciela, R.M. Forster, E. Dombrowsky, M. Huret, M. Payne, Y. Sagarminaga, and C. Schrum. 2011. Does operational oceanography address the needs of fisheries and applied environmental scientists? Oceanography 24(1):166–171, doi:10.5670/oceanog.2011.14.en_US
dc.description.abstractAlthough many oceanographic data products are now considered operational, continued dialogue between data producers and their user communities is still needed. The fisheries and environmental science communities have often been criticized for their lack of multidisciplinarity, and it is not clear whether recent developments in operational oceanographic products are addressing these needs. The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) Working Group on Operational Oceanographic products for Fisheries and Environment (WGOOFE) identified a potential mismatch between user requirements and the perception of requirements by the providers. Through a questionnaire (98 respondents), WGOOFE identified some of these issues. Although products of physical variables were in higher demand, several biological parameters scored in the top 10 rankings. Users placed specific focus on historic time series products with monthly or annual resolution and updating on similar time scales. A significant percentage requested access to numerical data rather than graphical output. While the outcomes of this survey challenge our views of operational oceanography, several initiatives are already attempting to close the gap between user requirements and products available.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherThe Oceanography Societyen_US
dc.subjectoceanographyen_US
dc.subjectoseanografien_US
dc.titleDoes operational oceanography address the needs of fisheries and applied environmental scientists?en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Geosciences: 450::Oceanography: 452en_US
dc.source.pagenumber166-171en_US
dc.source.volume24
dc.source.journalOceanography
dc.source.issue1
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2011.14


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel