Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorZahl, Inger Hilde
dc.contributor.authorKiessling, Anders
dc.contributor.authorSamuelsen, Ole Bent
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Magne Kjerulf
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-30T12:35:22Z
dc.date.issued2010-11-30
dc.identifier.issn1365-2109
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/117025
dc.description.abstractThe efficacy of the anaesthetic agents benzocaine, metacaine (MS-222), metomidate, 2-phenoxyethanol, quinaldine and isoeugenol was studied in Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus). Fish with an average body weight of 33 g were anaesthetized at 8 °C and fish with an average body weight of 1243 g were anaesthetized at 8 and 15 °C. Agents were tested individually and as combination anaesthesia comprising pre-anaesthetic sedation, followed by anaesthesia. Induction and recovery times varied in relation to the body weight and water temperature. Large fish had longer induction times and shorter recovery times, and displayed reduced responsiveness to handling compared with small fish. A higher temperature resulted in shorter induction times, longer recovery times and increased responsiveness to handling. Lower dosages were used for all agents in combination anaesthesia. In small fish, this had no effect on the induction times but resulted in shorter recovery times and reduced responsiveness to handling. In large fish, combination anaesthesia resulted in shorter induction times whereas no uniform trend in recovery times and no differences in responsiveness to handling were observed. Neither individual agents nor combinations blocked all reflex reactions to external stimulation in all fish of any treatment group. MS-222 and benzocaine, used separately or in combination anaesthesia, were the most effective agents in reducing reflex reactions.no_NO
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.publisherBlackwellno_NO
dc.titleAnaesthesia of Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) – Effect of pre-anaesthetic sedation, and importance of body weight and water temperatureno_NO
dc.typeJournal articleno_NO
dc.typePeer reviewedno_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920::Aquaculture: 922no_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920::Fish health: 923no_NO
dc.subject.nsihalibutno_NO
dc.subject.nsikveiteno_NO
dc.subject.nsianaesthesiano_NO
dc.subject.nsibedøvelseno_NO
dc.description.embargo10000-01-01
dc.source.pagenumber1235-1245no_NO
dc.source.volume42no_NO
dc.source.journalAquaculture Researchno_NO
dc.source.issue9no_NO
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02711.x


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel