Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHauge, Kjellrun Hiis
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-18T05:57:19Z
dc.date.available2012-10-18T05:57:19Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.citationThis report is not to be cited without prior reference to the authorno_NO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/106105
dc.description.abstractTraditionally, objectivity and neutrality along with testability and significance have been important standards of science. However, science has changed profoundly from small-scale experiments to large-scale problems of societal concern. Thus a revised set of scientific standards and ideals of quality is necessary. Fisheries scientists are educated at universities where traditional ideals are essential. In this paper I discuss objectivity and neutrality as measures of quality and how fisheries scientist relate to these ideals. Scientific ideals are challenged, and examples are discussed within fish stock assessment, whale counting and fisheries data.no_NO
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.publisherICESno_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesICES CM Documents;2000/W:6
dc.subjectfisheries researchno_NO
dc.subjectfiskeriforskningno_NO
dc.titleFisheries scientists` struggle for objectivityno_NO
dc.typeWorking paperno_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200::Education: 280::Other disciplines within education: 289no_NO
dc.source.pagenumber8 s.no_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel