Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorZimmermann, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorDickey-Collas, Mark
dc.contributor.authorNash, Richard D.M.
dc.contributor.authorHammer, Cornelius
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-07T08:54:23Z
dc.date.available2012-02-07T08:54:23Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationThis report is not to be quoted without prior consultation with the General Secretary.no_NO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/103234
dc.description.abstractICES coordinated surveys are, on a non-regular basis, reviewed by parent expert groups. A potential problem is that these are often conducted by evaluators being themselves involved in the surveys, thus lacking independence.Compared to the cost of most surveys, the funds assigned to quality control is minimal, and external peer reviews rarely happen. In the present case, the survey was increasingly reduced to the delivery of a recruitmant index for the assessment of the Western Baltic Spring Spawning herring, but the time series could never be used for the analytical assessment.no_NO
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.publisherICESno_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesICES CM documents;2007/P:10
dc.titleExternal peer review of survey serier: Lessons From the Rügen Herring Larvae Surveyno_NO
dc.typeWorking paperno_NO
dc.source.pagenumber1 s.no_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel