Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFernández-Chacón, Albert
dc.contributor.authorVillegas-Ríos, David
dc.contributor.authorMoland, Even
dc.contributor.authorBaskett, Marissa L.
dc.contributor.authorOlsen, Esben Moland
dc.contributor.authorCarlson, Stephanie M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-21T12:30:15Z
dc.date.available2020-10-21T12:30:15Z
dc.date.created2020-08-05T13:17:33Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationEcological Applications. 2020, 30 (5), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1051-0761
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2684215
dc.description.abstractHarvest mortality typically truncates the harvested species' size structure, thereby reducing phenotypic complexity, which can lead to reduced population productivity, increased population variability, and selection on an array of life history traits that can further alter these demographic processes. Marine protected areas (MPAs) are a potential tool to protect older, larger individuals and therefore mitigate such ecological and evolutionary effects of harvest, depending on the degree of connectivity among areas. Such MPA protection relies on a shift in size‐dependent mortality, the measurement of which can therefore serve as an early indicator of whether MPAs might achieve the desired longer‐term ecological and evolutionary responses. We directly measured MPA effects on size‐selective mortality and associated size structure using mark–recapture data on European lobster (Homarus gammarus) collected at three MPA–control area pairs in southern Norway during one decade (n = 5,943). Mark–recapture modeling, accounting for variation in recapture probabilities, revealed (1) that annual mean survival was higher inside MPAs (0.592) vs. control areas (0.298) and (2) that significant negative relationships between survival and body size occurred at the control areas but not in the MPAs, where the effect of body size was predominantly positive. Additionally, we found (3) that mean and maximum body size increased over time inside MPAs but not in control areas. Overall, our results suggest that MPAs can rebuild phenotypic complexity (i.e., size structure) and provide protection from harvest selection.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.titleProtected areas buffer against harvest selection and rebuild phenotypic complexityen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber14en_US
dc.source.volume30en_US
dc.source.journalEcological Applicationsen_US
dc.source.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/eap.2108
dc.identifier.cristin1821807
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 201917en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 294926en_US
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/93627en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel