Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKaitala, Veijo
dc.contributor.authorJonzén, Niclas
dc.contributor.authorEnberg, Katja
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-29T11:57:03Z
dc.date.available2010-10-29T11:57:03Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.issn0738-1360
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/108290
dc.description.abstractHeavy positively autocorrelated natural fluctuations in a fisheries stock level are problematic for fisheries management, and collapses in the stock dynamics are difficult to avoid. In this paper, we compare three different harvesting strategies (proportional harvesting, threshold harvesting, and proportional threshold harvesting) in an autocorrelated and heavily fluctuating fishery — the Norwegian spring-spawning herring (Clupea harengus) — in terms of risk of quasi-extinction, average annual yield, and coefficient of variation of the yield. Contrary to general expectations, we found that the three strategies produce comparable yields and risks of quasi-extinction. The only observable difference was slightly higher yield and variation in the proportional threshold strategy when the yield is optimized. Thus, it remains an open question as how to characterize the circumstances when it is particularly needful to apply threshold levels in harvest policies.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMarine Resources Foundationen_US
dc.subjectpopulation dynamicsen_US
dc.subjectpopulasjonsdynamikken_US
dc.subjectcatch strategyen_US
dc.subjectfangststrategien_US
dc.titleHarvesting Strategies in a Fish Stock Dominated by Low-frequency Variability: The Norwegian Spring-spawning Herring (Clupea harengus)en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920::Resource biology: 921en_US
dc.source.pagenumber263-274en_US
dc.source.volume18
dc.source.journalMarine Resource Economics
dc.source.issue3


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel